Return of the Lettercol
Moderator: Editors
Return of the Lettercol
I've tightened down the security and upgraded everything to the latest and greatest code. There's one lingering bug I can't quite get my head around, which is that the CSS for the boards isn't displaying properly in Mozilla-based browsers. The lettercol is fully functional, but Everything's in black and white. I have a support query open with the developers.
Meanwhile, I took the liberty of removing everyone from the membership roster who had never made a post. There were a lot of attempts by spammers to sign up, and I wanted to clear that off. If I accidently deleted a legitimate user, I apologize. Please re-register and share your comments with us!!
Sorry for the long delay. Recovering from the exploit essentially invovled setting everything up from scratch again, importing the old data, and then going back and tightening up the security, so it took a bit of time.
Now, go comment on those stories!!
Meanwhile, I took the liberty of removing everyone from the membership roster who had never made a post. There were a lot of attempts by spammers to sign up, and I wanted to clear that off. If I accidently deleted a legitimate user, I apologize. Please re-register and share your comments with us!!
Sorry for the long delay. Recovering from the exploit essentially invovled setting everything up from scratch again, importing the old data, and then going back and tightening up the security, so it took a bit of time.
Now, go comment on those stories!!
Re: Return of the Lettercol
The changes were not made out of choice but necessity. Unfortunately, someone figured out how to compromise the security of the lettercol and replaced the normally erudite discussion here with an advertisement for a gynocology textbook. I corrected this and it was hit again within hours, so I made the decision to pull it down until I could get it upgraded and locked down.
Rob,
You are the master. . .and I worship at the altar of your Geekdom. What happened? How many improvements have you made?
We put a note at the top of the zine page to let people know, but that's the only real place you could have found out, aside from e-mailing one of the editors.All I know is that I couldn't access from work and now I can from home on my MAC.
If there is more info out there, I have yet to find it.
Gonna guess you're using Safari then. :)I was afraid that someone on our contributor list might have been some super secret AI so they shut us down. . .
I Like the new look.
I like the new look too, except on Mozilla browsers where it's not quite rendering properly. Hoping to get that fixed soon.
See you on Saturday?
Bill
[/quote]
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Too bad these 'Hacker' don't spend their time writing! If they would turn their energy to writing, we would have some great stories 'popping' up!!
Tesla Lives!!!
- kailhofer
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Kaukauna, Wisconsin (USA)
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
As someone who checked the lettercol in a very public workplace just as the gynocological pic went up on my big screen, thank you for fixing it. I had to move very fast to close the offending image before any more people saw it.The changes were not made out of choice but necessity. Unfortunately, someone figured out how to compromise the security of the lettercol and replaced the normally erudite discussion here with an advertisement for a gynocology textbook. I corrected this and it was hit again within hours, so I made the decision to pull it down until I could get it upgraded and locked down.
I may not like my job, but I do need to keep it. :-[
Nate
- Robert_Moriyama
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
I'm using Netscape 8.0.3.4 'based on Firefox' ... Mozilla/5.0 ... and it looks fine. Maybe it's post-5.0 Mozilla that has a problem? :question
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
Jack London (1876-1916)
Jack London (1876-1916)
Re: Return of the Lettercol
I'm not the world's greatest CSS expert, so if you see anything that jumps out at you, I'd love to try and fix it.I checked to see what all the fuss was about. I confirm that Firefox 1.5.0.5 fails to render it properly. I saw what looked like some odd commands in the page source... I figured FoxV1.5 didn't get one of them, therefore the entire color scheme doesn't take.
Last edited by doc on August 06, 2006, 06:32:54 PM, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Wooot!!
The lettercol now displays properly in Firefox/Mozilla. The problem turned out to be a MIME type definition on the server, which I was able to fix by adding a directive to our webspace to define it properly. (Mozilla turns out to be very picky about what it's handed, while IE and Opera are apparently more forgiving.
To my knowledge, this was the only outstanding issue of the upgrade. Probability level has reached 1:1. We have achieved normality. Anything you can't deal with is therefore your own problem.
*NOW* I'm ready for the party!
The lettercol now displays properly in Firefox/Mozilla. The problem turned out to be a MIME type definition on the server, which I was able to fix by adding a directive to our webspace to define it properly. (Mozilla turns out to be very picky about what it's handed, while IE and Opera are apparently more forgiving.
To my knowledge, this was the only outstanding issue of the upgrade. Probability level has reached 1:1. We have achieved normality. Anything you can't deal with is therefore your own problem.
*NOW* I'm ready for the party!
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Sadly, my webserver is down, and that's where the photo was being hosted.Only one more problem, or rather two ;) Your picture seems to be MIA Doc, at least all I can see is the little red 'x' icon.
Also, some pictures (notably my own) seem to be scaled differently on the two axis', making me look somewhat squashed, like a Don Martin character in reverse.
For best results (and to save the bandwidth of people viewing the lettercol), it's best to resize your photos to 100x100 pixels. That's the largest it will allow to display in any event, and it doesn't seem to be very smart about constraining proportions.
It was an interesting project, and I owe a debt of thanks myself to the YaBB support team who patiently helped me work through the problems, and to all of you for your patience and encouragement.On the other hand, we now have pictures :D All in all, I have to congratulate you Doc, it must have been a helluva job putting everything back together again from scratch. Three cheers for the webmaven!
Well, to be honest, it didn't get moved for laziness on my part, really. But when I was having to change the links *anyway*, I figured I may as well make it a straight link. The old blub was mostly to explain why we were now requiring actual registration with valid e-mail addresses when we never had previously.Yay! I've lobbied (is that the correct word?) for the retirement of the "New" lettercol redirection page a couple of times. I guess my nagging paid off Grin
I'll be looking at some of the other new features to see what, if anything, we want to play around with. I really like that it tells you how much of the 25k maximum message length you've used as you type. :)
Last edited by doc on August 04, 2006, 03:28:39 PM, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Return of the Lettercol
It has to put in enough space to render the stuff on the left hand column.Hmmm, one other thing about the new interface. It seems to stick an awful lot of empty space into very short posts. Look at the two previous posts here, they're mostly empty space. Is that adjustable, somehow?
- Wishbone
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Not really. There's about a line of blank space between the last element in the left hand column and the signature field.
It's working just as it should.
It's working just as it should.
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Added in, just for you. :) The keyword is iainbeer :)Or like this:You mean like this one? [smiley=beer.gif]Shiny! We have pictures, and we have frames, and... :D Now begins my campaign for custom smilies, with beer steins in their hands :D ::)
- Wishbone, granter of wishes
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Several people have had this problem. A shift-reload seems to fix it in most cases. (Hold down the shift key and click the reload button).
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Well, now, that's passing strange. To be honest, I thought it looked ok on my screen (runniung Firefox), so I wasn't sure what you were complaining about, but...Okay, the image problem appears to be a matter of browser settings, or possibly browser version. It looks fine when I log on from work, but from home, the image looks somewhat squashed. I run IE both places, but two different versions.Also, some pictures (notably my own) seem to be scaled differently on the two axis', making me look somewhat squashed, like a Don Martin character in reverse.
- Wishbone
But I've discovered that no matter what you do, different browsers will do unpredictable things with the simplist of code.
- Robert_Moriyama
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Silly question -- would different screen resolutions and/or screen types (regular vs. widescreen) make a difference? The common resolutions (800x600, 1024x768, etc.) for a non-widescreen monitor work out to 1.333... to 1; but on a widescreen monitor, the ratio can be quite different. Hence the 'shape' of a pixel might vary considerably between two displays ...
Robert M.
Robert M.
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
Jack London (1876-1916)
Jack London (1876-1916)
- Robert_Moriyama
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
... and yet, on some widescreen TV sets (not a good analogy, I know), a 4:3 image DOES look vertically squashed because the hardware stretches the image to fill the screen. Does IE do that? It's a Microsoft product, so I wouldn't rule it out.
::)
::)
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
Jack London (1876-1916)
Jack London (1876-1916)
- Robert_Moriyama
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Crap. I copied them from previous months' stories, forgetting that the link has changed. I will fix this tonight (Eastern North American time, that is).None of the links at the end of the stories take me to the new Lettercol. Is that just me? Nobody else seems to have mentioned it, though this is a big chain and I may have missed the answer.
Gareth
Robert M.
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
Jack London (1876-1916)
Jack London (1876-1916)
- Robert_Moriyama
- Editor Emeritus
- Posts: 2379
- Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Return of the Lettercol
Okay, I just uploaded all 9 short stories with the Lettercol link corrected. They SHOULD work now, so go forth and pontificate!
Robert M.
Robert M.
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
Jack London (1876-1916)
Jack London (1876-1916)