Page 1 of 1
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 09, 2013, 09:56:00 AM
by Robert_Moriyama
Headsets, pillows, and alcoholic beverages will be available for an additional charge. Preferred-seat selection (window or aisle) $495,857.99. A variety of reconstituted freeze-dried rations can be purchase in-flight...
*****
And now, a partial score: Mars one, Earth ...
*****
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 09, 2013, 12:35:04 PM
by Lester Curtis
Looking at the qualifications -- well, it says they want people who are physically healthy, so I'm out. But --
Your thought processes are persistent.
As opposed to, say, intermittent -- ? And,
This is the foundation upon a mission must be built
Wait -- they said the language used would be English . . . looks like they forgot to mention they'll need an editor.
I wonder if swords will be issued for defense against the indigenous population and wildlife . . .
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 09, 2013, 10:38:13 PM
by Lester Curtis
2A. Skill sets. Notice not one single hard skill was in that list?
Yeh, I caught that too. "*Pffffftt* . . . *choke, cough* . . . here -- hit this again . . . "
Tao -- gotta stop you on this one --
While maybe not as fast as Moore, we should have seen X huge decrease in costs making moon vessels.
Sorry, but has the cost of ordinary automobiles gone down lately? Spacecraft aren't mass-produced like cars or phones, so we don't get the economy of scale working (not that that would help much). It's still, and
always will be industrial-scale machinery, like hundred-ton punch-presses, or maybe blast furnaces. With a zero-defect standard mandated for QC, AND some very special designing for environments that we just don't have to think about down here, like the temperature difference between the sunlit and shadowed parts of the equipment. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ . . .
Further --
but even in a colony ship of 200, you need one awesome freak-of-all-trades who can just *patch $hit*.
NO!! Not just ONE -- you need for EVERY SINGLE PERSON to be able to *patch $hit*, because even in a four-person craft, whoever is closest to the problem is gonna have to do something about it, no waiting for a special fix-it guy.
This goes to another thing; no matter how many people you send, quite a few of them should be multi-disciplinary, to a level of expertise that they can train others in their specialties. Probably most efficient would be to have each person be a dual specialist; that way, they only have to ascend to expert status in two fields, and the redundancies will overcome a certain number of losses.
By the way, I think big numbers make more sense, too. Start with something like two
thousand, since this is a
colony (one-way ticket).
Finally, I had to wonder how these people had planned for the one-way travelers to feed themselves -- and they're gonna have to be vegans, too. And, will they just get up there and die off, or will they be reproducing?
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 12:11:39 PM
by Robert_Moriyama
Maybe the "patch anything" guy(s) / girl(s) would be the awake-for-the-whole-trip attendants while most of the colonists are in cold sleep (or electronically / chemically induced comas) to reduce resource consumption (and therefore total mass to be transported). If systems got only slightly wonky, they would do the live-another-day quick fix, then wake the appropriate specialist(s) if necessary. (Most of the discussion seems to have been about the functioning of the colony -- but the "patch anything" guys would be even more important in transit.)
For that matter, in order to have greater genetic diversity (in case the colony is completely cut off from resupply / new arrivals for generations), they could carry frozen embryos or sperm and eggs (Green Eggs and Sperm -- I will not in vitro fertilize, Sherm I erm.). Use of artificial wombs or old-fashioned surrogacy could then allow for a gene pool much deeper and broader than would be possible with any number of adult colonists. (And the population growth could be delayed for a few years to allow more time for infrastructure development...)
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 12:23:34 PM
by Lester Curtis
TaoPhoenix wrote:Mark Edgemon wrote:I hope Mars don't stop making that candy bar...hummmm goooood!
Actually Mark if they're smart Mars, Inc. of the candy bar fame might have the best product placement ad spot ever if they work it right! I can envision the ads now!
"Once you've tried Mars, you'll never go back!"
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 12:59:53 PM
by Lester Curtis
but the "patch anything" guys would be even more important in transit.)
Not really . . . Mars ain't got a whole lot to breathe on it.
I'm thinking that EVERY mission member needs a few Universal Survival Skills (survival of the flight/colony/mission, that is) -- as a beginning list: Patch air leaks quickly, fight fires, and be an emergency medic. There might be a possibility of some other sort(s) of runaway process(es) that could be threatening; they need to know what to do for those too.
Seems logical that the colonists will have to live underground. Keeps the air in more reliably and shields them from everyday solar events, since Mars has squat for a magnetosphere. Besides, what's to look at outside?
Throw down a couple square miles of solar panels -- or keep those in orbit where they're always in sunlight and beam the power down.
They'll need a big farm. Get everybody to swear they love drinking recycled whiz and eating algal tofu for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Take along a big enough whiskey still, and you might get 'em to believe it.
Govern the place on the merit system, with leverage provided by the One Thing That Matters Most. All males are given reversible vasectomies before departure. The one that makes the most infrastructure improvement with his own labor gets to have his ductwork unplugged. TEMPORARILY.
Damn . . . was that sexist -- ? All right. Same deal for the ladies. Sooo, only the
best pair get to make a baby. I could see some real teamwork developing in the race for the mayor's office.
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 01:19:58 PM
by Robert_Moriyama
Lester Curtis wrote:but the "patch anything" guys would be even more important in transit.)
Not really . . . Mars ain't got a whole lot to breathe on it.
But breathing isn't your only problem in transit. Actually getting to your destination requires that engines and navigational gear be functional when you need them. Getting there alive requires the literal plumbing and environmental systems to be working pretty well, too (to preserve perishable food, even if the colonists aren't frozen).
Having everybody effectively sterilized (even if theoretically in a reversible way), with only the "best" earning reproductive rights, would reduce your pool of potential volunteers to those whose egos assured them they would be among The Chosen. And when some of those egotists did not make the (un)cut, you would have the First Martian Revolution on your hands.
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 04:25:15 PM
by Lester Curtis
Robert_Moriyama wrote:
Having everybody effectively sterilized (even if theoretically in a reversible way), with only the "best" earning reproductive rights, would reduce your pool of potential volunteers to those whose egos assured them they would be among The Chosen. And when some of those egotists did not make the (un)cut, you would have the First Martian Revolution on your hands.
Actually, I think anyone who'd sign up for this thing would have to be near the top of the Supreme Egotist list to begin with . . . to quote from
Men in Black, "The best of the best of the best! Sir!"
Population can't be permitted to grow until the life-supporting infrastructure expands, or someone dies. Things could get interesting in a hurry . . .
Mark wrote:
Robert,
Why don't you, create a shared universe project using this theme, maybe call it Mars One.
In light of the above, maybe a better title would be,
Last on Mars. 
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 10, 2013, 10:31:05 PM
by Lester Curtis
Mark Edgemon wrote:Lester Curtis wrote:Mark wrote:
Robert,
Why don't you, create a shared universe project using this theme, maybe call it Mars One.
In light of the above, maybe a better title would be,
Last on Mars.
Don't poo on this idea yet...let Robert think it over, weigh all the time versus enjoyment value and then, let HIM poo on it.
Mark, you seem to have taken my comment the wrong way. The richness of possibilities here is more than obvious, and I'd get a hoot out of seeing it developed. I could happily involve myself in such a story project -- just not in the real mission as it's been presented.

Re: Mars One
Posted: January 18, 2013, 05:09:46 PM
by Lester Curtis
bottomdweller wrote:It seems to me that humanity needs to first learn to terraform Earth into a livable planet (get rid of the global warming apocolypic thing), then begin to terraform Mars enough to increase the atmosphere...way before we start sending people there forever. Come on, you know they'd be at each other's throats after 5 years, when the other team showed up. It's decades too early for this thing to work.
MARS (candy, number) ONE!!!
It's doubtful that Mars could sustain a liveable atmosphere. It doesn't have a magnetic field to speak of, thus no magnetosphere to prevent solar radiation from burning off the atmosphere. The level of radiation there is therefor too high for plant life of the sorts needed to generate breathable air. Vicious circle.
Terraforming Earth -- ? Hell, we've
been doing that, for about six millennia. We just need to learn to do it the
right way, for the right
reasons, which, I'm afraid, would likely require a major overhaul of human nature, especially in politics.
Re: The Mars One Shared Universe Project
Posted: January 19, 2013, 11:59:41 AM
by kailhofer
Mark Edgemon wrote:Robert,
Why don't you, create a shared universe project using this theme, maybe call it Mars One. Layout a writing project plan with a format for how writers contribute. For example, each writer writes one chapter at a time, based on the previous chapters written with you starting it off or each writer participant writes according to an outline given to them etc.
Something interesting to do during low acticity periods.
You've got yourself, Tao, Lester, me, Michele and Sergio to start. You might get Bill, Gino, and other past writers too!
You edit the entire manuscript to bring continuity and a over riding single style and or voice to the project. Maybe I could record and produce an audio version and possibly we could find artists to illustrate...new members!
There already seems to be a lot of interest in this topic.
Mark
We've already had a shared Mars universe project waiting in the wings for years--literally years--the Bill Warren Aphelion Explorer series (which I call
The Aphelion Project), championed through the flash contests. I worked everything into individual entries and a combined story (that would keep getting bigger with each new entry) and made a series Bible. Bill Warren created a Concordance of every bit of detail a human could, and even wrote an original story for the series that no one has ever seen.
And that's where it all fell apart. I have the stories ready, at least as far as I can tell since I don't have ftp access to upload them or test them, or, for that matter, a place to put them if I had. No one answered my inquiries to get a place, to get access, or to check to see if I was doing any of it right. Bill Warren turned out to be... how shall I say... difficult... a hyper-hard fiction fan, and wanted every not-working-in-real-life part of the series be fixed. He only made one piece of rendered art and some exploded ship views, instead of a piece for each story like he said he would.
It's been depressing, and everyone's work kind of languishes on my hard drive instead of being seen by a larger audience. And I loved those characters, too. All I could conclude was that maybe if someone who was less of a pain in the ass than me was in charge of it, something would be done. I took an awfully long time myself, so I'm no saint in this, but shame on all of us that the series doesn't live on the digital page.
Let's face it, going to Mars still captivates us all. To quote the opening line from the series bible,
"12 SOULS... THE RED PLANET... ONE DESTINY, STILL BEING WRITTEN..." How can that not draw us as writers in?
Re: New Site
Posted: January 20, 2013, 01:22:51 AM
by Robert_Moriyama
TaoPhoenix wrote:Mark Edgemon wrote:
The Bill Warren's project can be published as is or revamped, renamed, illustrated (a planet of artists ready to submit entries for credit) and voice talent who could be cast in parts, also for resume credit.
Not to edge out Tao's kind offer, I've just been thinking about this for months. With enough support from here, I'd be willing to start calling one another and collaborate on the design as we put the new site up.
Hi Mark,
I'm quite happy to let this be a "C - Both" situation. I've been reading productivity-problem solving stuff today, and my offer was definitely in the spirit of the fullback in soccer: "Problem - ball headed towards goalie. Solution: Just Get Rid Of It. All the *other* positions jockey for finesse and do sequences, etc. I always liked playing fullback because that position has a kind of ruthless honesty about it: Rip Ball Away From Enemy (with your feet!) Kick To Friend (accurately!) Done. In other words, in a sorta "perfect soccer game" the goalie can stand there and eat a sandwich. (Darnit, Magpie now wants to know if the rules of soccer or maybe baseball actually forbid eating during a game!)
So to use the metaphor, Problem: Languishing brilliance sitting on Nate's HD.
To add a little drama (Magpie wants to know what sound effect you'd use for this Mark!) if it wasn't for minor details such as Nate having a job (bleh real life!), we'd get this:
Solution:
I'd give Nate *my* login password (because I'd have switched it for a day)
He goes RightClick on his local Mars folder/Send To/Zip File
About 5 clicks to get to the admin section of the site
File Manager/Upload/Browser/Click Zipped File
Up goes the nice little bundled package
Server unpacks it all.
I download the original zip file/extract here
Run the Drive Reader
Plunk it into the WebPage Slammer Spreadsheet
Upload the index web page.
Ball Kicked. Files Visible. In an hour.
I *absolutely* agree this has ZERO finesse. So yes, you can do awesome things with it after that over at C&C. I also don't know what the toe-stepping implications are here. But the problem was to Get Files (Ball) *anywhere* to look at. I'm an extreme functionalist fullback that can get the files into view. I pass the baton after that.
I see Mark is whining about how people ignore his suggestions again. His suggestion re: controlling spammers by requiring somebody to review each one individually sounds great, as long as you don't consider that we get HUNDREDS of memberships registered on a daily basis. Mark doesn't see most of them because I purge the inactive and the active registrations several dozen at a time. Suppose somebody had to review each one individually... Still interested in volunteering, Mark?
And I wonder how the 2 million hits per month figure for Mark's site was calculated? What percentage of the posts to Mark's pet folders in the Forum are by Mark? If Mark could translate "eyeballs" to revenue, he'd be rich, and wouldn't have to bother with unprofessional peasants like me. Or I could quit and let Mark take over everything I do...
Re: New Site
Posted: January 20, 2013, 01:56:26 AM
by Lester Curtis
Robert_Moriyama wrote:
I see Mark is whining about how people ignore his suggestions again. His suggestion re: controlling spammers by requiring somebody to review each one individually sounds great, as long as you don't consider that we get HUNDREDS of memberships registered on a daily basis. Mark doesn't see most of them because I purge the inactive and the active registrations several dozen at a time. Suppose somebody had to review each one individually... Still interested in volunteering, Mark?
Yeah, Mark gets fixated and impatient. Nobody's perfect. Robert, I really doubt that all the registrations would still come through. Seems to me that a hell of a lot of 'em are done by bots, and maybe we'd stop getting those if we shut off self-registration. And maybe the human-delivered ones would slow down a lot too, if the spammers saw that their registrations were being filtered by a real person.
The thing is, I
don't know -- but I'd really like to. Can someone answer this question for us? I'm not enjoying the deluge of crap any more than you are. What exactly
will it take to get this spam problem fixed? The
proper solution (update) isn't being done, and until it is, I really wouldn't mind trying something that would slow the shit down. And as far as reviewing new applications individually, it can't get much harder than it is now: look at the usernames they pick. Is someone trying to log in as "aend7bq3[038tyu" going to expect to be taken seriously? Less than one percent of the usernames have a chance.
Re: New Site
Posted: January 20, 2013, 12:23:38 PM
by Robert_Moriyama
Mark Edgemon wrote:Robert_Moriyama wrote:I see Mark is whining about how people ignore his suggestions again. His suggestion re: controlling spammers by requiring somebody to review each one individually sounds great, as long as you don't consider that we get HUNDREDS of memberships registered on a daily basis. Mark doesn't see most of them because I purge the inactive and the active registrations several dozen at a time. Suppose somebody had to review each one individually... Still interested in volunteering, Mark?
And I wonder how the 2 million hits per month figure for Mark's site was calculated? What percentage of the posts to Mark's pet folders in the Forum are by Mark? If Mark could translate "eyeballs" to revenue, he'd be rich, and wouldn't have to bother with unprofessional peasants like me. Or I could quit and let Mark take over everything I do...
Glad to see some signs of life from you, ole' pal.
In the first paragraph, you recharacterized my suggestion/advice into a stupid one that has no chance of working.
Reboot.
If you have a sign up rule that state that usernames must be words used in the English language and the prospective member must send to the membership director their desired username and password, then most of the spam would stop stone cold dead.
Why?
01. I doubt spammers would sign up by sending e-mails.
02. If they do, they would have to follow the rules and stop using gibberish usernames.
03. The membership director can check out behind the scene data to validate the sign up is legitimate such as where they are from, the type of e-mail, what Lester has commented on in a few posts. etc.
There is only a few legit members who sign up each month out of the many, many spam who get in. Ignoring the gibberish usernames and deleting them would take almost no time at all because - they are e-mails and "not" on the forum to begin with.
If we change sign up to adminisration only, zero spammers get aboard.
The time invested would be less than a tenth of what is being wasted now.
That's what I have said in previous posts.
You are the one who is whinning with statements like
You are trying to make my job harder (Well then draw from the current members who want to help and distribute the workload)
I'm going to quit one day - oh, I really mean it THIS time (If you are dissatisfied and you are not happy and or no longer enjoy doing the work, get a replacement who wants to do it - such as McCamy, Nate, Lester, Verse and we'll throw you a going away party - online of course!)
I've been offering to help for years and yes Robert, I will help and be glad to do it. I offered it to Lester on more than one occasion and he has but to ask.
In reference to my site, I haven't changed it in over a year, because the site presentation has been working as an example of audio story production, so none of the hits are from me, except to check the stats from time to time. Most of the hits are people downloading either the original literary works as pdf's or the audio story productions as mp3's. (But that was kinda absurd to suggest I am visiting my own site between one and two million times a month.)
Anything else on your mind. You know, if you keep your mind active, you can remain coherent longer in your oncoming years.
I have a day job... dunno about you. What with the multiple "games" (where you are the most frequent poster), I don't know when you would have the time for one. And please try to choose between "whining" and "whinging" -- "whinning" is something Charlie Sheen would say when on too many meds.
As for the likelihood that bots would send e-mails -- bots do send e-mails by the millions. Some script jockey could probably craft a lovely routine that would grab the captcha key, generate a lovely, human-sounding username, and send an e-mail, all in a handful of microseconds. And once one does it, his toolkit would spread to every spam-factory and computer-zombifyer (i.e., Trojan horse / virus that causes infected machines to generate spam and / or spread the infection) on the planet. There are thousands of spammers, many of them humans that get paid to spread crap by any and all means possible. We would almost certainly get dozens a day, especially if the humans took it as a challenge. You know humans -- they tend to get testy when criticized, unlike god-like beings named Edgemon.
Re: Fun!
Posted: January 20, 2013, 01:51:07 PM
by Robert_Moriyama
Mark Edgemon wrote:By the way Robert, I still enjoy your banter, matching my wits with whatever it is that you are using!

Mark
If you really think I'm bluffing about quitting, give me a firm commitment that you will take over all my duties, here, in public. Then I will send Dan my resignation, and forward all the backlog of submissions to you. I've been Short Story editor and de facto assistant site administrator for longer than Cary Semar handled the job, and it's probably time to move on.
And to be quite clear, I don't find most of your posts particularly funny... and that ain't jealousy, that's my opinion, as someone who has read a lot of crap and a lot of good material over the years. I'd take quality over quantity, and I wouldn't count recycled jokes, lines from movies and TV, and the like, as "intellectual content" or "wit".
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 20, 2013, 02:00:48 PM
by Lester Curtis
Mark -- Robert -- don't make me throw a bucket of cold water on the two of you.
Nate -- you've got two offers to publish the shared Mars project (which I had never heard of before), and enough evident interest to say yes to one of them.
Spam --
We have flood control enabled, set at 30 seconds between posts. I'm sure that isn't working.
We have (mail dot ru) in our banned email list, and we still get about 20 percent or more of our spam from them. THAT isn't working.
Our Captchas don't work.
That's at least three board security features that are broken. Some of the other filters may also be disfunctional; I don't know. To the best of my understanding, they can't be patched until the board software is updated -- and the current version is no longer supported.
JOB ONE: BOARD SOFTWARE UPDATE.
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 20, 2013, 02:10:23 PM
by Robert_Moriyama
Lester Curtis wrote:Mark -- Robert -- don't make me throw a bucket of cold water on the two of you.
Nate -- you've got two offers to publish the shared Mars project (which I had never heard of before), and enough evident interest to say yes to one of them.
Spam --
We have flood control enabled, set at 30 seconds between posts. I'm sure that isn't working.
We have (mail dot ru) in our banned email list, and we still get about 20 percent or more of our spam from them. THAT isn't working.
Our Captchas don't work.
That's at least three board security features that are broken. Some of the other filters may also be disfunctional; I don't know. To the best of my understanding, they can't be patched until the board software is updated -- and the current version is no longer supported.
JOB ONE: BOARD SOFTWARE UPDATE.
Software update can only be done by Doc. I have asked him to update on a few occasions, but haven't been "relentless" enough. I'm not sure if the updated version would be much better, or would allow the things being suggested here. Nobody has updated the Back Issues index in years (something that I could do, but keep putting off), and the Author Index hasn't been updated since 2004 (I think) -- something Tao worked on that was never implemented (and something that authors keep asking about). Send PMs and e-mails to Doc re: the update -- if he gets them from multiple sources, and keeps getting them, he will be more likely to do them.
Or he may quit. He does have a life outside of Aphelion, and a pretty complicated one in recent years.
Maybe Dan needs to recruit a whole new crew (aside from Iain, who hasn't complained about anything, and McCamy, who is happy to be back after illness kept her sidelined for a long while).
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 20, 2013, 03:35:06 PM
by Lester Curtis
Back to the subject of spam (again) --
our board version WILL support the Q&A challenge that does work -- see:
https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtop ... &t=2159180
https://www.phpbb.com/kb/article/how-to ... a-captcha/
-- trouble is,
we don't have that option installed!
Also, there is now a new
automated update package that should make the process easier.
Re: Mars One
Posted: January 20, 2013, 08:37:25 PM
by kailhofer
Lester Curtis wrote:Nate -- you've got two offers to publish the shared Mars project (which I had never heard of before), and enough evident interest to say yes to one of them.
There's a problem with both of the proposals: they're not on Aphelion. The series was proposed on Aphelion and the parts made on Aphelion for publishing on Aphelion, in the zine and in the flash index. I don't own the stories other than those I wrote, and the series is an amalgamation. The rights are not free and clear to just do whatever I want. But... Aphelion doesn't use the content. There is no folder to upload them to and I don't have access to put them there if there was. This is the Catch-22.
Mark, I just don't understand *how* it wouldn't compete with Aphelion. It would use Aphelion's content.
Every one of us who are here in the forum every day wants more people to read Aphelion. I think that's safe to say. To get those hits, it may take a diversification to hit a new market, or it might not. The internet evolves, and fiction will as well, I suppose. Whether or not this would be the way to go is a very unclear thing. It may be great, but it might not, either.
I guess maybe we should look at it in business terms. What would Aphelion get out of it? What benefits would be realized? Traffic? or more than that? On the other side, what's in it for Mark (or whomever does that work)? Why would it be a mutually beneficial deal?