Page 1 of 1
The Ultimate Experiment By Walt Trizna
Posted: May 17, 2010, 10:36:36 PM
by Lester Curtis
I don't quite know why, but this one just fell flat for me . . .
Posted: May 22, 2010, 10:13:07 PM
by Lester Curtis
This may be topic drift, but I just lately learned a new way to think about what constitutes a dimension.
Start with a point, of course -- zero dimensions -- then stretch it out into a line -- one dimension. You only need one piece of information to describe your location on that line.
Bend that line into a curve and join the ends to form a circle. Is it now two-dimensional?
No, because you can still describe the location of any point on it with only one piece of information.
Now consider a sphere . . . is that three-dimensional?
No, it's
two-dimensional, because you can find any point on its surface using only latitude and longitude (we're talking only about surfaces here, not the volumes within them). I like this one especially, because in my sci-fi universe, all starship courses are plotted by altitude and azimuth.
So, the dimensionality of a thing is described by the number of pieces of information you need in order to find a location on or in it. Welcome to topology.
Check it out:
http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedescl ... x?cid=1460