Allen Mosquito
Posted: June 04, 2007, 04:47:02 PM
The intro gets one’s interest, and I think the title is a good piece of advertising.
One mistake I found in grammar: Natkin death should be Natkin’s death. I make so many mistakes myself that I’m starting to examine every story for errors, even the newspaper!!!
I enjoyed to story, the science, the battles, and the ant size aliens who wanted to protect their home.
But the story had very little characterization. Dr. Bruce Meyer's remained more of an object then a person and the aliens remained just aliens! No personality to them, and there should have been.
Characters that come alive make the story for many. A terrible story that has good characterization is better than a great story with little characterization, usually but not always.
I have read stories with little character development and little sensory input that were excellent in plot and tone. And the lack of character development in those stories appeared to add to the story. Very talented authors can go against the writing rules and still come out a winner. I’ve seen it and I’m sure many others have too.
Generally, in writing----non professional like myself---we should stick to good character development, sensory input and all the rules that are supposed to make a story worthy. I’ve been attempting to learn the basics, then, with time I hope, I’ll be able to deviate from the basics and still make the story work! In time!
This story does show the potential of a good story without much character development, and to be honest, it did work for me!
If the alien judge acted like judge Judy, then the story would have really taken off. After all, just image someone trying to convince Judge Judy that he/she/it is an alien!!
However, on the positive side the description and sensory input of the corpses and lab worked for me. And the communication methods with the aliens----odors and dances---reminded me of insects upon which I could visualize an alien-insect like being. Good description throughout the story---not too much but just the right amout---really worked.
As the story unfolded, I became more interested!! And the ending--I had already figured it out---
wasn’t a let down. It became a smooth integral ending.
To recap, I liked the story, loved the science and thought that the story line was not some rehashed version. And the story did work form me even with the needed attention to characterization.
Good Job!
One mistake I found in grammar: Natkin death should be Natkin’s death. I make so many mistakes myself that I’m starting to examine every story for errors, even the newspaper!!!
I enjoyed to story, the science, the battles, and the ant size aliens who wanted to protect their home.
But the story had very little characterization. Dr. Bruce Meyer's remained more of an object then a person and the aliens remained just aliens! No personality to them, and there should have been.
Characters that come alive make the story for many. A terrible story that has good characterization is better than a great story with little characterization, usually but not always.
I have read stories with little character development and little sensory input that were excellent in plot and tone. And the lack of character development in those stories appeared to add to the story. Very talented authors can go against the writing rules and still come out a winner. I’ve seen it and I’m sure many others have too.
Generally, in writing----non professional like myself---we should stick to good character development, sensory input and all the rules that are supposed to make a story worthy. I’ve been attempting to learn the basics, then, with time I hope, I’ll be able to deviate from the basics and still make the story work! In time!
This story does show the potential of a good story without much character development, and to be honest, it did work for me!
If the alien judge acted like judge Judy, then the story would have really taken off. After all, just image someone trying to convince Judge Judy that he/she/it is an alien!!
However, on the positive side the description and sensory input of the corpses and lab worked for me. And the communication methods with the aliens----odors and dances---reminded me of insects upon which I could visualize an alien-insect like being. Good description throughout the story---not too much but just the right amout---really worked.
As the story unfolded, I became more interested!! And the ending--I had already figured it out---
wasn’t a let down. It became a smooth integral ending.
To recap, I liked the story, loved the science and thought that the story line was not some rehashed version. And the story did work form me even with the needed attention to characterization.
Good Job!